Is it good public policy to have your entire electorate pay taxes?
(unable to find attribution)
If so, why? If not, why not? I'm trying to figure out how it is healthy to have 35-40% of the electorate outside of the income tax system.
I think that everyone should pay something in income tax, and that the amount they pay should go up or down with total federal spending. Otherwise nobody has any incentive to control spending, and we wind up . . . well, where we are.
Everybody should pay. Even if it's only a $5 per week. We live in the greatest country ever devised and all should contribute to it's maintenance even if it's tiny compared to the services they receive. That way there's some understanding that government services cost money. We all have a stake in the size of the federal government and letting some opt in, by voting, while contributing nothing is corrosive to the system.
We need everyone to share responsibility for funding government. That's the only way to maintain the incentive to keep government spending under control. The largest consumers of government services are predominantly those who provide the least amount of support for those services.
At the very least, one should not be able to get a bigger "refund" than they paid in.
No comments:
Post a Comment