Gored by a Nobel Joke
10/26/2007
Matthew Schwartz
Guest Columnist
Jewish Times
It's official: The Nobel Peace Prize is now a joke. In selecting Al Gore and the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel as joint winners of the Nobel Peace Prize, the Norwegian Nobel Committee continued its relentless quest to discredit Alfred Nobel's legacy.
This embarrassing course took root in 1994 when terrorist extraordinaire Yasser Arafat was a Nobel Peace Prize recipient. How Arafat's engineered murder of 11 innocent Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics qualified him as a Peace Prize recipient is difficult even for irrational "truthers" like Rosie O'Donnell to explain.
In 2002, the Norwegians chose to honor Jimmy Carter for his laudable work in connection with Habitat for Hamas. Carter's latent anti-Semitism has even earned the rebuke of such fellow liberals as Alan Dershowitz, who has gone through great pains to expose Carter's lies and the millions of dollars of Arab bribery that most likely motivated them.
The Norwegians further disgraced themselves by lionizing the United Nations on numerous occasions. The United Nations is an entity composed mostly of tyrannical regimes that oppress innocent people when they are not too busy murdering them. And their representatives have the chutzpah to chair such notable U.N. committees as the Human Rights Council (Libya) and the Nuclear Disarmament Commission (Iran). It is no wonder that the U.N. Human Rights Council has condemned only one country during its tenure - Israel - while merely expressing "deep concern" about countries like Sudan, where actual genocide is prosecuted. Add to this farce the well-documented corruption of Kofi Annan (the 2001 Nobel Peace Prize laureate), and the Mandalay Bay sports book will pay even money on a bet that the 2008 Peace Prize laureate will be Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Fidel Castro or Hugo Chavez.
It is within the company of these celebrated peacemongers that Al Gore finds himself while the rest of us are left scratching our heads and asking why. To begin with, what in the wide world of sports does raising awareness about global warming have to do with world peace? And even if one's imagination is so elastic as to perceive such a dubious nexus, one must further wonder why it is acceptable to honor someone who is predisposed to spreading lies to support a hysterical political agenda.
Did the Norwegians even blink last week when a British court issued an "inconvenient order" restricting the use of Al Gore's film in British public schools?
If you get your news from CNN, NBC, CBS and ABC, you probably missed the story about the High Court ruling that Gore's An Inconvenient Truth contains at least nine material misrepresentations and constitutes unreliable political propaganda. Consequently, British public schools are not permitted to exhibit the film without sufficient warnings about its falsehoods and bias.
Alas, the Goracle lied a bunch in his movie, but he's OK with that because we can't afford to let pesky scientific facts get in the way of saving the planet. Gore expressly admitted in Grist Magazine that he believes "it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous (global warming) is." Oy vey.
The reality is that the Nobel committee is blindly devoted to disseminating Al Gore's propaganda, and it matters not whether this is reasonably related to world peace, nor whether there are any factual inaccuracies in Brother Gore's Traveling Global Warming Show. Unfortunately, the Nobel committee has followed the beaten trail of most universities and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences by devolving into a politicized tool of truth-challenged left-wing propagandists. No longer should we revere what they stand for. Instead, we should regard all of them with suspicion and contempt. These collectivist secularists certainly do not have the best interests of the United States nor the Jewish people at heart.
In any event, the utility of promoting a peace award in the 21st century should be questioned. We are in the throes of an unprecedented war that pits religious freedom against religious totalitarianism. Given their numbers and impervious religiosity, our enemies pose more danger to the United States (and Jews in particular) than German Nazism and Soviet communism combined. The naive and clueless among us are looking for a resolution within the next few years by bringing our troops home, eroding American sovereignty and sharing our wealth, while our death-enamored enemies adopt a hundred-year suicide campaign to avenge their god. Clearly, we're not seeing eye-to-eye on things.
I suggest we hold off on promoting peace prizes and instead promote a Victory Prize. For only in a victory over Islamo-fascism will we ever again enjoy a moral state of peace. And that's no joke.
MATT SCHWARTZ
No comments:
Post a Comment