by Charles Hakes
04/05/09
David Brooks, op-ed writer for the New York Times told Rush Limbaugh:
"The Idea That We Shouldn't Be Rooting for Obama is Just Stupid".
Yes -- stupid in the sense that we don't root for the opposing team, the condemned man doesn't root for the hangman, we don't root for the bull at a bullfight, and not many of us root for the terrorist element in the world.
Stupid -- in the sense that we don't root for cannibalism, or child molestation, or drug gangs, or cop killings.
Stupid -- in the sense that we don't root for dishonesty, uncleanliness, stupidity, sloth, or values counter to American culture.
Stupid -- in the sense that some of us don't root for socialism, communism, tyranny, anarchy, denial of Constitutional rights, and usurption of our personal guaranteed freedoms.
That's why many of us don't root for Obama.
Brooks roots for Obama, and why not. He is a writer for the liberal New York Times, which forsook responsible journalism to work for the election of Obama by what they chose to print, what they chose not to print, and how they worded and placed what they did print.
So, of course Brooks wants us all to join him in supporting Obama. That's what he and the Times have wanted all along. They support Obama as much as does ACORN except in a different way.
Here's why the Times does this: We can all see that many newspapers are sliding into oblivion. The New York Times is reportedly no longer in clover either. Now just who do you think is likely to bail out a newspaper that is going broke? How about leftists whose wrecking ball started hammering the economy as early as the 1960's with Social Security funds "redirection", who started demolishing the foundation of the lending markets in the late 1970's with sub-prime loans, who stuck taxpayers with making good on the loans via Fannie and Freddie in the 1990's, and who now take us deeper and deeper into socialism with increasingly grander government spending and debt.
Socialism can save the New York Times if it comes to that. And Brooks knows which side of his bread the butter is on. The New York Times began it's plea in an earlier editorial by Eduardo Porter, lamenting that if newspapers perish who will watch city hall. The editorial made no mention of the fact that Porter was a member of the New York Times' editorial board and thus has a financial stake in the preservation of newspapers -- specifically the New York Times. This was a noteworthy step toward seeking favorable public opinion toward a bailout if it were needed.
So Brooks says that we should root for Obama. That would make sense if he were trying to fix the economy and preserve American values. Sixty million Americans didn't want Obama or his agenda. An untold number of others were incapable of cognition in the matter. Some thought black was a qualification for the presidency, although it is neither a qualification nor a disqualification.
The American public should be starting to suspect that Obama doesn't want to fix the economy. Why would he? It is the source of his power. The worse the economy is for Americans, the more opportunity it gives to him.
We kid ourselves that he means the free enterprise economy. He means a socialized economy.
Know this: All Obama understands is socialism. He will do anything and say anything to pursue this goal for America. He has already shown that he will say anything to further his goals. Now that he is in office we are seeing that he will also do anything.
The present recession/depression gives him the power he needs to socialize the economy, to dictate to companies, and to enslave the American people to debt.
That's why he doesn't pay more than lip service to the priority issue of getting the economy going while he puts us in debt for everything else and goes off like a firecracker in all directions at once. That's why his programs are pork and pet projects and band-aids on economic sores.
He already said it will take a long time to fix the economy. By fix he means completely socialize. He and his rogue band are on a power trip to own the American people and make us work for them.
You get some clues from what he says. You get more reliable clues from what he does. Everything -- everything he has done since his inauguration is socialistic and a centralized power seize.
Why don't we root for Obama? Because to Obama everything is socialism -- just like to Puumba everything is gas.
No comments:
Post a Comment