Iran Gives Obama, West Middle Finger
by Mark Noonan
September 25th, 2009
You expected something different?
President Obama and the leaders of France and Britain blasted Iran’s construction of a previously unacknowledged uranium enrichment facility and demanded Friday that Tehran immediately fulfill its obligations under international law or risk the imposition of harsh new sanctions.
“Iran is breaking rules that all nations must follow,” Obama said, detailing how the facility near Qom had been under construction for years without being disclosed, as required, to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). “International law is not an empty promise.”
Yes, it is, Mr. President - international law is not just an empty promise, its a figment of liberal imaginationunless it is backed up by a clear threat to use US military force. America - and America alone - has the combination of moral justification and military power necessary to be the enforcer of international law. If we won’t do it, then no one will. Period. End of story. Take Canada, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, India and Brazil and roll them all together and you don’t have an equal amount of morality and force - none of these nations will actually enforce international law because they either can’t, or don’t even see the need. They will, if we lead, come along with us some times - but they won’t come along at all if we’re not willing to do so.
We are dealing in Iran with leaders who murder their own people in cold blood - people who are willing to do such criminal acts are not going to be deterred by lectures from an American President, nor tut-tutting from international do-gooders. People like the leaders in Iran do whatever they think they can get away with - right now, they think they can get away with building nuclear weapons and, truth be told, going back to the last two years of the Bush Administration there has been no indication that anyone would stop them.
Now it is crunch time - now we must decide: will we permit Iran to have nuclear weapons? If the answer is “yes”, then we might as well leave off the false rhetoric of condemnation as issuing such, and then doing nothing, not only makes us look cowardly, it also makes us look dishonest. If the answer is “no”, then we must steel ourselves to act - first against Iran’s gasoline supplies, finally against Iran’s military forces, if that proves necessary. Regardless of our choice, there will be wide repercussions around the world - there’s no way to ignore this and hope it will go away. An Iran armed with nukes will have an effect, an Iran prostrate under US force will have an effect - which effects do we want?
As for me, I prefer to take a calculated risk of war and deal with Iran, right now, before they can build nukes and put them on IRBM and ICBMs. My fear is that we’ll get nothing but waffling from Obama - statements of condemnations out of one side of his mouth, appeasement of Iran’s leaders out of the other…
No comments:
Post a Comment