What Bob Herbert wrote:
"The Scourge Persists"
By BOB HERBERT NYTimes summary:
"The fact that a black man is in the White House has so unsettled much of white America that the lid is coming off the racism that had been simmering all along."
09/19/09
Response By Chuck Hakes
Mr. Herbert, what you have written is a shame and a sham. I can only assume that your purpose is to paint anyone who disagrees with Obama and his policies as being racist.
I don't care that Obama is black. I care that he is a Marxist who will take away American freedom and bring us totalitarianism, and I don't like it.
I would remind you that Obama listened to Rev. Wright's Marxist black liberation theology for 20 years. A Harvard lawyer can comprehend what he listens to for 20 years and wouldn't listen for that long if he were in disagreement.
I don't like that Obama's slide into the presidency was greased by half- truths, and lies, and "trial balloons" like his early campaign attempts to avoid patriotic icons and practices until he caught on that wouldn't work.
I don't like that he is marginalizing our elected representatives by having a cadre of "czars."
I don't like that he has no covenant with the American people and has lost all credibility with some of us, not because of the color of his skin but because we can't believe him.
I don't like that he wants to scrap the world's finest health care system to make us all dependent on the federal government for our lives. We don't need to throw away something that works well and satisfies 80% of our citizens in favor of something experimental and exceedingly more costly. Obama's arguments for socialized medicine are rife with misinformation, half truths, and false data. And that's too big a topic to go into here.
Do you realize, Mr. Herbert, that the black vote went 95% for Obama and that Obama got 37% of the white vote while winning 53% to 46%? Tell us, Mr. Herbert, why did more than 5% of whites vote for Obama? That would have been commensurate with the black vote for McCain.
The white candidate, McCain got 63% of the white vote. The black candidate, Obama got 95% of the black vote. If Obama had gotten 67% of the black vote, the same percentage that McCain got of the white vote, McCain would have won with 52% or more of the vote.
Racism was at work on Election Day all right. It favored Obama.
Money favored Obama also. His margin of victory over McCain cost $17.53 per vote. The source of these funds has never been identified. Obama's initial agreement to use matching funds was a subterfuge. The strange coincidental sequence about his funding was that first, Obama agreed to matching funds. Simultaneously he avoided displaying patriotism. Then he reneged on his matching funds agreement. Then the funds rolled in, from whence has long since been buried. Then Obama realized that he was going to have to display patriotism to get more votes, so he did it.
Given this sequence, I ask if Obama's avoidance of patriotic display was in some way related to the decisions of some to donate to his campaign.. We might understand this better if we knew who donated.
Do you like fairness issues, Mr. Herbert? Is it fair to buy the presidency? Who bought it for Obama?
You and others may paint me as racist for what I've just said to you. You and others are not the judges of my "political correctness." I do not grant you that power and I do not care what you think of me.
I reserve the right to approve or disapprove of anyone I choose for political reasons, regardless of their race, creed, or color. That, Mr. Herbert, is true egalitarianism without co-dependency.
So don't even think of implying that my disapproval of Barack Obama and his administration is racist.
Don't play the race card with me. It is not a trump.
Chuck Hakes
No comments:
Post a Comment